Home

Advertisement

friends [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
ianracey

[ website | I, Ian ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

The Waters of Mars icons [Nov. 15th, 2009|07:24 pm]

doctorwho

[_pseudofriends]
[Tags|]

[51] Doctor Who "The Waters of Mars"

No teasers, I hope that is okay. I don't want to risk spoiling anybody, haha.



ALL HERE.
linkpost comment

Ficlet: The Planet of Cats, Hats, and Fairytales (Doctor/Donna) (G) [Nov. 15th, 2009|10:23 pm]

doctorwho

[catvampcrazines]
[Tags|]
[mood |sore]
[music |Lisa Loeb - I Do | Powered by Last.fm]

Title: The Planet of Cats, Hats, and Fairytales
Author: Cat
Pairing: Doctor/Donna
Rating: G
Prompts used (courtesy of [info]time_converges during my earlier prompt call) : color, sunlight, lush
Note: Also written with the aid of Write or Die and soothing Lisa Loeb and Common Rotation music playing. Hmmm. This is quite fluffy, you're warned, but at the same time it makes my heart ache a bit.

linkpost comment

12 Doctor Who animated icons [Nov. 16th, 2009|06:10 am]

doctorwho

[renestarko]
[Tags|]

12 icons from The Waters of Mars & The End of Time preview.

Icons may contain some spoilers.

all of them

Teasers:

linkpost comment

Two things... [Nov. 16th, 2009|03:01 am]

doctorwho

[avantgardenism]
[Tags|, ]

Firstly, in celebration of Waters of Mars, some fanart - constructive crit welcome!

Cut for dail-up murdering pictures )

Aaaalso, on an entirely unrelated note. I was watching endless repeats of Mock the Week, as is my slightly tragic wont. And they had a section called "things you wouldn't hear in a war film", and for three of them made me think instantly of Jack.
Cut for NSFW )
linkpost comment

Doctor Who November Special caps [Nov. 15th, 2009|07:20 pm]

doctorwho

[marishna]
[Tags|]

I have 1042 caps (624x352) from the Doctor Who special, "Waters of Mars", up for grabs in my personal journal. Please comment on the links download post if you're snagging any.

Samples )

For more samples, permanent zips and a gallery, please see and comment to this post.
linkpost comment

FMV Tiems [Nov. 15th, 2009|08:08 pm]

doctorwho

[curriejean]
[Tags|, , , ]

Zaza challenges Jack to a duel. Be warned -- it's filthy!



Download

Master List

Thanks for watching! ;)
link1 comment|post comment

Screencaps: Doctor Who - 4x16 - "The Waters of Mars" [Nov. 15th, 2009|06:11 pm]

doctorwho

[potthead]
[Tags|]

Screencaps: 731
Resolution: 1248x704
File type: jpg



Gallery & download links here @ [info]rawr_caps
linkpost comment

Godless Billboard Moved After Threats [Nov. 15th, 2009|03:11 pm]

dominionism

[nebris]
[mood | cynical]

via www.wcpo.com

CINCINNATI -- In the wake of multiple, significant threats, the downtown billboard that says “Don’t Believe In God? You are not alone” came down early Thursday morning.

The billboard had gone up Tuesday afternoon at Reading Road and 12th Street, one block south of Liberty Street and it is being moved to a new site Thursday at the Sixth Street Viaduct.

The group that funded the billboard, the United Coalition of Reason, was contacted by Lamar Advertising of Cincinnati. Lamar reported that the landowner of the site had been threatened over the billboard's message and wanted it taken down. )
linkpost comment

'Waters of Mars' destop wallpaper from Mitashade. [Nov. 15th, 2009|06:01 pm]

doctorwho

[mitashade]
[Tags|]

Well I just watched 'Waters of Mars', and I was inspired to make a wallpaper for myself. Then I figured I might as well share it!

It's free to take for personal use.



Full size at my journal. Totally vague spoilers for 'Waters of Mars'
link2 comments|post comment

whats the doc's new look going to be. ( in clothes wear?) [Nov. 15th, 2009|10:41 pm]

doctorwho

[karname]
[Tags|, , ]

Does any one know what the new doctor going to wear???? I was just wondering have they reveild it yet.
link4 comments|post comment

Doctor Who End of Time Trailer [Nov. 15th, 2009|09:34 pm]

doctorwho

[thereshedances]
[Tags|]

Youtube video )
link54 comments|post comment

Exclusive preview [Nov. 15th, 2009|09:10 pm]

doctorwho

[yodacrook]
[Tags|]

This post is to talk about the christmas episode exclusive preview ...
Spoilers, of course )
link59 comments|post comment

Wanna Be a Virtual Author’s Assistant?…Maybe Not [Nov. 15th, 2009|11:00 am]

sfwa

[sfwa_admin]
[Tags|, , , ]

posted by Victoria Strauss for Writer Beware

Writer BewareAs readers of this blog know, I’m fascinated by the strange phenomena that flourish at the fringes of the publishing world. So I was thrilled recently to discover yet another example: an online course that teaches people how to become Virtual Author’s Assistants.

What’s a Virtual Author’s Assistant, you may ask? The course website offers this explanation:

Author’s Assistants are people who work behind the scenes to create, organize and coordinate all the different pieces necessary to get a book published. To writers, they are miracle workers.

The world of publishing can be frightening, overwhelming and frustrating. An author’s assistant is the expert the writer turns to guide them step by step through the process.

From their homes, Virtual Author’s Assistants organize the publishing process for authors around the country and around the world.

Expert? As it turns out, potential Virtual Author’s Assistants need know nothing about the publishing industry. “[D]on’t worry. We’ll teach you. All you need is a love of books, a few basic business skills and a desire for fun and interesting work.” (Wow. Who knew this publishing stuff was so easy and entertaining? I must have missed that nugget of wisdom in my 25+ years as a writer and writers’ advocate. And gosh, I must be awfully dense, because after all that time, I’m still learning.)

Read the rest of this entry »

Mirrored from SFWA | Comment at SFWA

link1 comment|post comment

Native American Spirituality in Children's Books [Nov. 15th, 2009|09:55 am]

thru_the_booth

[debbyedwardson]
I know it’s unorthodox, but I am going to add one final mini-post on an issue that won’t let go of me. Debbie Reese said, “There are some things that I think non-Native writers ought to stay away from: religion, spirituality, worship.”

She also said something very provocative: “Most Native writers don't even put that in their books. Why do non-Native writers feel the need to do it?”

The question you, as a non-Native writer, should ask yourself is this: why don’t Native writers put overt references to Native religion, spirituality and worship in their books? Take a minute to think about it. This is important.

Okay. Time's up. Let’s be totally honest here. We all know that if we as writers are, say, Christian, it is not okay to preach in our books, not even obliquely. It’s not even okay to mention religion except in passing, very casually, in a nondenominational sort of way. Unless of course it’s a problem novel in which religion is the problem. These are the rules and we all know that if we don’t follow the rules we will not sell our books, except maybe to Christian niche publishers.

In fact, what Debbie said about Native writers not writing about their religious beliefs is also true for most Christian writers—writers like Katherine Patterson, for example, or Madeline L’Engle. They do not take us into their inner sanctuary of their own spiritual world. CS Lewis has been soundly criticized for sliding his Christianity in sideways.

So now, in the non-Native context, ask yourself the same question again: why don’t Christian writers put overt references to Christian religion, spirituality, and worship in their books? Sure it is partially market driven, but isn’t it also a question of—what shall we call it—respect? Etiquette? It’s not acceptable. We all understand this.

We all also know, again, being totally honest, that if we want to write a book that celebrates “Native American” spirituality we are free to take it as far as we can. Make it a beautiful picture book full of dances and sacred chants and let it wear its ideology in bright colors right up front. If it is well written, publishers will welcome it with open arms. No one will cry foul play, quit preaching at my kid—no one except the most fundamentalist parent, who will ask that it be banned for promoting witch craft—but we all know that those guys are just plain crazy, right?

Actually, I would submit to you that the fundamentalist parent is the only one who believes in the reality of Native spirituality because he thinks it could have power over his kid—a negative power, mind you, but power none-the-less. The fundamentalist is like the early missionaries in this part of the world who convinced people that Eskimo dancing was evil, which they did because they knew the dancing had power, spiritual power of a distinctly non-Christian flavor. The rest of the modern day folks think it’s okay to brandish this Native spirituality in books because it isn’t really real Religion. Not with a capital R. It has something to “teach us,” in a new-age sort of way, but we aren’t being be asked to convert. No one will come knocking on our door in a headdress. The shaman isn’t going to really leave his body and fly to the moon while the kids are watching. This stuff is not real. It’s a cultural relic. That, it seems to me, is the underlying assumption here (correct me if I am wrong.) Think about what this means. It’s another kind of stereotyping, isn’t it? A really ugly kind.

I don’t agree with Debbie about staying away from spirituality in writing about Native peoples or any people. Spirituality is a large part of that which makes us human. We can’t write living, breathing, human beings if we amputate their spiritual natures. I can’t write a book about the Inupiat that refuses to allow the reader to see them dancing, where appropriate (and I didn’t write that kind of book when I wrote Blessing’s Bead.) And I can’t write a book that refuses to acknowledge that whaling and the whale are at the spiritual core of what it means to be Inupiaq (and I didn’t write that kind of book when I wrote Whale Snow.) But the point is, I think, that if your character has a specific spiritual belief, it’s part of who they are. You don’t have to lecture about it until everyone suddenly remembers they have someplace else to be. If you are writing about a character who has a deeply felt spiritual belief—one that you understand completely, whether or not you yourself share it—the spiritually will come out in your writing, through your character and the way he or she acts. You don’t have to follow him into the synagogue or the sanctuary or the kiva and explain everything he’s doing and why he is doing it. That’s rude and intrusive and probably really boring for the reader. You don’t have to take it upon yourself to give your reader a theology lesson—you don’t have to say, “and now Cindy was Christian and she knew that in order to get to Heaven she had to believe in Jesus Christ as her one true savior and say her prayers at night…” That’s preaching. If you understand them well, your characters' spiritually will come out in how they act, what they do, what they value--and it will come out whether you think about it consciously or not.

You can substitute any religion in the above sentence and comes across as either preachy or superficial and yet this is what a lot of people do when they write Native books. They think they have to explain it, like tour guides. The problem with this, other than the fact that it makes for bad writing, is that most of the people writing this stuff do not understand the this brand of spirituality on the deep wordless level where authentic spirituality resides and the way it is written is thus often insulting to those who do.

That’s my take.
link2 comments|post comment

Can You Help Me Please? [Nov. 15th, 2009|06:09 pm]

doctorwho

[jaded_jamie]
[Tags|]
[mood |hopeful]

A while ago, when they were filming Season 4, there was a photo of DT pointing at Davros with a huge fanboy grin on his face.

I had it and I cant find it. Does anyone please have it and would you share it with me?

I would really appreciate it...



Never mind! A fan of win sorted me out with it X-D
link14 comments|post comment

Just one hour to go... [Nov. 15th, 2009|06:07 pm]

doctorwho

[seph_hazard]
[Tags|]
[mood |excited]

We're all excited about tonight's Doctor Who, I hope? Here is a post for you to comment with squees, reactions, thoughts, criticism, general love-ins and links to offcomm reviews. Have fun!
link339 comments|post comment

The Walters Of Mars [Nov. 15th, 2009|12:42 pm]

doctorwho

[vortex_of_mirth]
[Tags|]

Cross-posted to [info]vortex_of_mirth

Continued behind cut... )
link2 comments|post comment

Michael Moorcock replies to fans [Nov. 15th, 2009|05:31 pm]

doctorwho

[thehornedgod]
[Tags|]

More from Michael Moorcock on his forthcoming Who novel:

1) I've been watching Dr Who since it began. Haven't liked all the doctors and after Peter Davison stopped watching regularly until the new BBC Wales series.
2) Since the Tom Baker series, a lot of my ideas crept into the stories and so in many ways I'll be writing a story which already echoes my own work.
(Possibly he's talking about the White/Black Guardian, Order/Chaos stuff?)
3)I do have to submit it to editors so they can make sure it fits into the canon and this, of course, is understandable. By saying it wasn't a tie-in I did, of course, mean that it would be an original novel, not one which was linked to previous stories.

I share an enthusiasm for the current Dr Who broadcasts with quite a few friends who are 'literary' novelists and I sense in some of the Gallifrey remarks
(someone showed him some comments from Gallifrey Base) a suspicion of the 'outsider' which you used to get when someone with a reputation as a non-sf writer would decide to write an sf novel. All I can answer to this is 'wait and see'. I'm certainly not a non-watcher! Neither am I someone who ascribes a kind of religiosity to an enthusiasm. This phenomenon crops up a lot, these days associated with sf/fantasy, LOTR, H.Potter, Twilight and so on. I hate these presumptions of exclusivity either in my own corner of the literary world or elsewhere. Mike Kustow, once director of the Royal Shakespeare Co, described this as 'the anxious ownership syndrome', when faced with his first confrontation with sf fandom in Brighton 1968. He'd found the same sort of expression with Shakespeare fans when someone from 'outside' showed an interest.

I've been asked to write Dr Who scripts or stories almost since the series began, because I was known to enjoy Dr Who. Only recently did the time feel right to me to do one. I'm going to enjoy that, too.
link11 comments|post comment

Nebula Nomination Period has opened [Nov. 15th, 2009|12:28 pm]

sfwa

[sfwa_admin]
[Tags|, , , ]

Nebula logoIn January of 2009, SFWA adopted a new set of Nebula Rules. This year is their first in effect so we thought we’d review the process for those who are curious.

  • From November 15th – February 15th, Active and Associate members may nominate up to 5 works in each category of the Nebulas, the Bradbury and the Andre Norton Award.

  • Members may change their ballot at any point during the nomination period.

  • Only works published between July 1, 2008 and December 31st, 2009 are eligible.

  • The 6 items in each category that receive the most votes go on the ballot. (The Norton Jury may add up to 3 works on the Norton ballot.)

  • By March 1st, the final ballot is sent to Active members only.

  • The Nebula ceremony is in May

What is eligible for a Nebula?

Works published between July 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 are eligible in the following categories.

a. Short Story: less than 7,500 words;
b. Novelette: at least 7,500 words but less than 17,500 words;
c. Novella: at least 17,500 words but less than 40,000 words
d. Novel: 40,000 words or more.
( At the author’s request, a novella-length work published individually, rather than as a part of a collection, anthology, or other collective work, shall appear in the novel category. )

This is the confusing bit. As part of the transition rules, works which received at least five (5) recommendations under the previous Nebula Awards® rules and were published after July 1, 2008, but didn’t make the 2008 Preliminary Ballot get to have those nominations added to their total for this year. Members who recommended these works last year will not have their total number of allowed nominations reduced, but they may not nominate these works a second time.


Works which received less than five (5) recommendations under the previous Nebula rules and were published after July 1, 2008, may be nominated but their nominations don’t carry over from last year.

According to the last published NAR, the following works and members are affected by this.

Novelette
6 Kosmatka, Ted:
Divining Light (Asimov’s, Aug08) DWGoldman, STourtellotte, EJStone, NKress, MMcGarry, CDeLancey

Short Story
5 Burstein, Michael A.:
I Remember the Future (I Remember the Future, Apex Publications, Nov08 <Single-author collection>) JPelland, CArdai, MResnick, PLevinson, RSawyer

Mirrored from SFWA | Comment at SFWA

linkpost comment

Did Mona Lisa's Revenge "Pull a Purves"? [Nov. 15th, 2009|04:44 pm]

doctorwho

[sparkymark]
[Tags|]

Cut for spoilers and cross-dressing )
link13 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement